SimbergKrevansAbelKraftKleinGoldberg
Conroy Simberg Named to 2024 "Best Law Firms"
List by U.S. News - Best Lawyers®
Conroy Simberg is a full-service civil defense law firm committed to providing outstanding representation and personalized legal services to each of our clients.
We have built a strong reputation for delivering skilled and experienced legal counsel to insurance companies, businesses, professionals and self-insured organizations. Our solution-oriented attorneys understand the financial pressures that our clients face and focus on creating strategies and solutions to resolve their cases in the quickest and most efficient manner. When a settlement cannot be achieved, our attorneys aggressively represent clients at all stages of the litigation process.
Founded by Tom Conroy and Bruce Simberg in 1979, Conroy Simberg has grown to a firm with over 150 attorneys practicing in 11 offices located throughout the State of Florida and in Thomasville, Georgia. We have focused on expanding our firm by developing highly qualified partners and associates that broaden our areas of expertise.
For more than 40 years, Conroy Simberg has established itself as a full-service civil defense firm, proudly serving the legal needs of insurance companies, self-insureds, and other related entities. Clients choose our firm because they value our longevity, loyalty, and outstanding legal results.
Conroy Simberg is committed to increasing diversity and inclusion at all levels within the firm regardless of race, ethnicity, age, gender, religion, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, economic status, and or other diverse backgrounds so that the firm will reflect the demographics of our clients.
On November 6, 2024, Joshua Canton, Managing Partner of the firm’s Tallahassee office, and Mattie Birster, an associate in the firm’s Tallahassee office, obtained a defense verdict in trucking case in the U.S District Court for Northern Florida that involved claims of tortious interference with a business relationship and defamation following a two-day jury trial. Plaintiff, a trucker, claimed that the defendant, a common carrier, falsely reported to the DOT that plaintiff refused to submit to a random drug test and asked for $700,000 and punitive damages. Defendant argued that Plaintiff had in fact refused to submit to a drug test under the applicable regulations and that the report to the DOT was truthful. The case turned on how various regulations of the FMCSA applied to the facts of the case. The jury returned a defense verdict in an hour and a half.
Read More