SimbergKrevansAbelKraftKleinGoldberg
August 25, 2022 | Verdicts and Settlements
Rod Lundy, a partner, and Tylar Heintz, an associate, both of our Orlando office, secured a favorable verdict in Orange County, Florida following a 7 day trial.
August 22, 2022 | Verdicts and Settlements
Conroy Simberg's Hinda Klein obtains a reversal of a trial court‘s award of attorney fees in a PIP suit filed over pennies of interest.On August 17, the Fourth District Court of Appeal issued its opinion in Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. PAN AM Diagnostic Services Inc. d/b/a PAN AM Diagnostic of Orlando a/a/o Claudine Jean, 4D21-2156, (Fla. 4th DCA 2022), reversing an attorney fee award of $24,028.27 in a suit filed over $0.14 cents of statutory interest.
August 15, 2022 | Verdicts and Settlements
Dale L. Friedman, a partner in the firm’s Hollywood Office, and Diane H. Tutt, an appellate partner in the firm’s Hollywood Office, recently obtained summary judgment in a wrongful death case brought by the personal representative (mother) of an intellectually disabled adult who was residing in a group home and was struck and killed by a vehicle as he walked across a roadway to get a snack. The Plaintiff was represented by a very well respected personal injury law firm in Palm Beach.
August 10, 2022 | Legal Alerts
Florida has been known as one of the most difficult states for insurance companies to do business in. However, recently, Governor Ron DeSantis signed two important bills, Senate Bills 2D and 4D, into law that will change how insurance companies do business in Florida and the legal climate they may face. Given that the new laws take aim at some of the worst abuses propagated by plaintiffs’ lawyers, they can be thought of as consumer-friendly.
August 4, 2022 | Verdicts and Settlements
Noelia Vaccaro, an associate in the firm’s first party property & coverage practice, was successful in a first-party property Tropical Storm Gordon claim. The Defense filed a Daubert motion to strike the plaintiff’s expert. The court agreed that the plaintiff’s expert testimony did not meet the Daubert standard as the methodology was conclusory. As a result of the Court granting defendant’s Daubert motion, the plaintiffs dismissed the action on the eve of trial.